Deinocheirus mirificus, or ‘unusual horrible hand’, had long, clawed forearms, a sail on its back and a duck-like bill 
Nearly 50 years after researchers uncovered the gigantic arms of a 
mysterious dinosaur in the Gobi desert, the true nature of the beast has
 finally been established.
 
Since its discovery in 1965, the only clues to the engimatic creature
 were its shoulders and forelimbs – the latter measuring an astounding 
2.4 metres long – and a few ribs and vertebrae dug from the ground by a 
joint Polish-Mongolian expedition.
 
The fossils were extraordinary enough for scientists to declare the 
dinosaur a new genus and species. The name they decided upon was Deinocheirus mirificus, meaning “unusual horrible hand”.
 
In the absence of more complete remains, early reconstructions were 
at times wildly speculative. In 1970, one palaeontologist argued that 
Deinocheirus was a giant sloth-like climber
 that hung beneath the branches of enormous trees. A more accurate view 
put the dinosaur in a group of beaked omnivores called ornithomimosaurs,
 which resembled giant ostriches, at least superficially.
But writing in the journal Nature
 on Wednesday , a Korean-led team of experts has transformed scientists’
 understanding of the animal. They report the discovery of two nearly 
complete 70 million-year-old Deinocheirus skeletons, pieced together 
from fossils unearthed in Mongolia, along with a skull and hand that had
 been poached and sold on to private collectors.
 
With the new remains, the researchers built the first accurate 
reconstruction of the dinosaur. The creature stood tall on its back 
legs, but sported long, clawed forearms. Neural spines formed an 
impressive sail on its back and its long, toothless snout flared out to 
both sides. The duck-like bill may have helped Deinocheirus forage for 
food at the bottom of streams, while blunt, flattened bones under its 
claws prevented it from sinking on wet ground.
 
One of the new specimens grew to 11 metres long and weighed more than
 six tonnes. Its broad hips and large feet suggest it was not agile. The
 animal likely fed on plants and small animals, though the remains of 
fish were found among its stomach contents.
Read more here

 
No comments:
Post a Comment